After reading earlier comics
such as Little Nemo, early Charlie Brown, and Krazy Kat. You can really see the
way that comics have evolved both visually and in writing over time. I found trying to
read the some of the earlier comics to be quite the task, especially with Krazy
Kat. Sometimes trying to understand what words are being said can be quite
difficult in such small word bubbles and with hand written text. After reading
20 or so strips I understood the premise of the comic, but the humor was still
sometimes a little lost. It may be
because I am not fluent with the popular culture of the time.
Yet from
the other comics I read Krazy Kat was the only one that did not have children
as the main characters. I am not totally sure why this is, or if there is a
reason, but I do know that there is some appeal to seeing animals and children placed
in such crazy situations. It may be that
using Children and animals in comics may bring about a sense of innocents that
can seem comical when juxtaposed with serious topics.
In Charlie
Brown we see a cast of children going though everyday anecdotes with no set
theme or context between one strip or the next. This is different then Krazy
Kat or Nemo, as in those comics we see that there is already a set foundation
on how the story of the comic will normally traverse, but in Charlie Brown it
was unique every time. You can see many of the same qualities and sense of
humor that is communicated through Charlie Brown comics in many of Bill Watterson’s
Calvin and Hobbes, which comes many decades later.